^^ If you're looking for a little pessimism, Ginsan, here's a thought:
 Originally Posted by Ginsan
1 Woman said she had extremely vivid lucid dreams where she often cannot even tell whether she is dreaming or not (but she is aware and actually wondering whether she is dreaming or not!), she said she would often call people and talk to people to find out whether she was dreaming. I don't remember how long these dreams are, but anything from an hour to 3-4 hours a night. The dreams have consistent maps/locations and physics works and electronic devices usually work.
You might be wary of folks who offer up such grand stories of success... especially when they mistakenly equate lucidity with vividness or realness.
Lucidity is about having the presence of your waking-life self-awareness in a dream; about knowing you are dreaming... nothing more, or less. By the same token lucidity has nothing -- nothing -- to do with vividness or accurate renditions of reality, unless you make the changes yourself after you are lucid (and then of course you wouldn't wonder about anything).
To say your LD's are just like reality, to me, actually diminishes your account, because that means that you are still accepting the "reality" as offered by your dreaming mind in a non-lucid context (NLD's are generally "real," when perceived by a non-lucid mind; it's when you wake up later that you realize they weren't real). Again, calling friends to see if you are dreaming implies a lack of lucidity, and not a wealth of it, as do things like consistent maps/locations and physics works and electronic devices usually working (again, they all tend to work in NLD's, or at least appear to at the time; it is because of your lucidity that they fail). And then she throws in that her dreams last for hours, probably without an asterisk saying that she practices DEILD-chaining (though there are certainly exceptions, dreams by their nature really can't last much longer than 2 hours) -- a NLD can easily, as you probably know, feel upon waking like it went on for hours, though; sort of makes you wonder, doesn't it?
From my experience with folks like this (often well-meaning, BTW, but there are a lot of 'em), she is either deeply confused about the nature of lucidity, or else might be inflating her experience just to impress.
I would take reports like this with a grain of salt, Ginsan, and also would avoid using them as examples of how good people can get at LD'ing, because it really presents incorrect information about the state, and the experience.
[I know this has nothing to do with the topic, but I felt obliged to throw in my 2 cents on this.]
Also:
To the optimists in this thread, GET REAL. Some people maybe just can't get lucid? It sucks but maybe affinity for lucid dreaming and dream recall is another one of those things that is not distributed equally, like health, IQ, an attractive face, genes for athleticism, being born in poverty, to shitty parents, in a shitty society or being born in a nice place, just plain being lucky for not getting into a terrible accident or catching a nasty disease. You see clear evidence of his failure despite his great attempts and pretend that it doesn't matter and that he just needs to do a better job, it is dishonest.
Well said, and I agree. But keep in mind that LifeGoneWild was talking about failure at DILD, and not lucidity in general. It might not yet be time for us optimists to GET REAL, or for you to suggest that failure might be inevitable, until after LifeGoneWild has experimented with WILD as well.
I mean no offense, Ginsan. It's just that optimism is critical to successful LD'ing, and telling someone that failure might be inevitable before they have covered all possible bases is, to me, not constructive.
|
|
Bookmarks