Hi Dthoughts. Thanks for keeping an open mind and for being respectful, considerate, and thoughtful.

The experience of the eye is the experience of the body, and it is (or it matches) the space that we are in. The eye/body is visible and invisible. Think hard on that one. It's worth it. Then think more. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body.

Full inertia and full electromagnetism may be associated with flat space. Regarding the visual extension of space, full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Stand upright and look down at the Earth/ground. Consider the range of feeling/touch.

------------------------
Dreams are not creations of thought, and they cannot be held to be hallucinations either. Dreams are separate from, and yet they are undeniably and fundamentally linked with, our being and our experience. The mistake among the dream theorists is to hold that dreams are entirely/only separate experiences. Dreams balance being and experience. Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Television is a creation of thought, as it is fully like thought. Dream experience is semi-detached in relation to touch. Television is fully detached in relation to touch. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual.

I have proven in my work that dreams involve equivalent and balanced inertia and gravity. Accordingly, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space, with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance.

Waking experience is at the actual end of the spectrum. Half gravity and half inertia in dreams (middle distance). Dreams are in the middle. Television is at the potential end of the spectrum. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual. Dreams balance being and experience. Think about it hard.

Notice how the body may appear as either invisible or visible in dreams. Dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space, and dreams balance being and experience. These are great ideas, and they are facts.

The blue (exteriorised) sky forms a half of a sphere, as it is half falling, circular, translucent. The flat, orange/red sun (at a right angle thereto); is this not an "interiorised" representation of the Earth? What of the orange magma/lava in (and) on the Earth/ground? Here is a good one. The slight curvature of the moon matches the slight curvature of the Earth/ground. The nature of electromagnetism is possible/potential. The real/direct/actual experience of outer space as it is (including the sun in outer space) precludesd and destroys us, our thought, our experience, and our visual experience.

The fundamentals are just not there in the modern approach. Newton was right that inertia must be a property of space itself. Outer space is full inertia. Television is full electromagnetism and full inertia.

This is fundamental to physics: Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance is the middle distance in/of space (clearly, logically, and fundamentally) consistent with half gravity and half inertia. Invisible space is semi-detached in relation to touch. Outer space is detached in relation to touch. Visible space is not detached in relation to touch.

There is no extension of space, body/bodily experience, and visual experience in the absence of real, fundamental, and true inertial and gravitational equivalency, equilibrium, and balance. Stablized and fundamental distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched is fundamental. Is the eye (the experience of the eye) not in possible/potential/actual form? Is the eye/body not quantum mechanical/quantum gravitational in nature? The eye is visible and invisible. The body is visible and invisible. Think.

Dreams are definitely quantum gravity.

Dreams balance being and experience. A huge truth/fact. Think about it.

My ideas merit very serious consideration. That is clear.