It sounds to me, IndigoRose, that you need to work on your fundamentals (self-awareness, memory, and expectation/intention), with, as Occipitalred said, a focus on memory. Also as Occipitalred said, in my opinion you are already there, experience and consciousness-wise; all that's needed now is a little tweaking of your presence in your dreams... I think that if you learn to develop your self-awareness and memory in waking-life, you will find that "tweaking " much easier during your dreams.
In the first session of my DVA WILD Class, I presented an exercise I called a Reverse Reality check; I suggest you check it out, as it might help.
Finally, I highly recommend that you take up (or retake, perhaps?) a MILD practice. Even if you don't care about DILD's, the exercises in MILD are most helpful in developing the lucid mindset necessary to achieve the goals you are looking for. Also, I suggest you go right back to LaBerge's instructions in EWOLD, as they are still the cleanest available.
That's all I got; I hope it helps!
As long as I'm here, though, I can't resist some bullets for OccipitalRed:
Originally Posted by Occipitalred
This perspective confuses me. I think it's the mainstream perspective in the modern lucid dreaming community (and I say that in a validating way). I think I might have become delusional by detaching myself from this perspective but here's what's weird to me: why is lucid dreaming defined as some sort of specific meditational state?
It isn't, at least by me. There is nothing meditative about remembering to remember, or gathering waking-life self-awareness in a dream (or in waking-life, for that matter). There is nothing deep, meaningful, or supercritical about this action; in fact it is little more than a decision.
Why is lucid dreaming defined as deep metacognition?
Again, it isn't, at least by me, and shouldn't be by anyone. I firmly believe that one of the errors of advanced LD'ers these days, and the tutorials they spawn, is putting too much introspection and other deep thought into their philosophies and instructions. Lucid dreaming, full-on lucid dreaming, is nothing more than simply being your self -- your waking-life self -- during the dream. Adding more simply confuses both instructor and instructees.
It's kind of trippy to do in waking life, in the first place. You have to focus your attention on the awareness of your awareness. And then you need to hold that attention... effortlessly. Just doing that in waking life is... an exercise, to say the least. Now, you have to spontaneously remember to do that during a dream and maintain it? And supposedly complete dream tasks and enjoy an engaged interaction with the dream? Otherwise... it's only semi-lucidity?
Awareness of awareness is sort of a silly term to me, and decidedly complicates simply being present/self-aware. You don't need to observe and appreciate self-awareness, you need only have it... yes, the practice necessary to achieve this state easily can be difficult, but the best things (like LD'ing) usually need a little extra effort, don't they?
When we dream... we are asleep. Our brain is asleep. Asleep does not mean unconscious. While we dream, we are definitively conscious. But our brain is no longer in the same state. Am I wrong to think that cognitive abilities are reduced during sleep?
Well, again in my opinion, yes, you are. Our cogntive abilities work just fine in dreams; what is impaired is our ability to access memory. Without that access, the sharpest mind in the world can't properly process thoughts or interpret sensory input (real or imagined). But with that access, cognition works just as well in a dream as it does in waking-life, because you can access real memory to assess the unreal stuff you see in dreams (i.e., when semi-lucid you might be quite comfortable with the "fact" that your long-dead grandmother is chatting with you, as though she were still alive, but if your granny is chatting with you when fully lucid, you can remember that she is dead -- and the experience just might be more wonderful for that remembering).
Why is lucid dreaming supposed to be dreaming with no cognitive ability disruption + metacognitive meditation (unnecessary to a clear thinking waking experience)?
It isn't!
I thought lucid dreaming was about nurturing a clearness of mind amidst sleep. Like being mindful while very drunk. If you get very drunk and practice mindfulness, are you supposed to beat yourself up for not becoming Buddha in that moment, rather than enjoy the nurturing of sobriety amidst drunkenness?
I think of it more as nurturing a clearness of mind that immediately sobers my drunken mind, through conjuring self-awareness and accessing memory. If a dreamer ever, ever imagines that he must become Buddha (per se, of course) to be a successful LD'er, he is definitely on the wrong path. All he needs to be is present.
And is our memory not by definition impaired during sleep? Clearly, it's still accessible. But, is it not inherently and obligatorily disrupted?
No, it is not. Yes, access to memory is shut off during normal dreaming, and that is certainly by genetic design, but an LD'er has the ability to turn it back on, to access memory as if she were awake. Lucid dreaming almost by definition -- being awake while you are asleep -- is done in defiance of nature. We humans do lots of things in defiance of nature, why not this? Also, to assume that access to memory is inherently and obligatorily disrupted is to guarantee that it will be.
Does anyone's experience with lucid dreaming really look like suddenly accessing a perfectly clear mind with none of the disruptions and changes of sleep?
Yup. That state is relatively rare for me, but, yup.
When I read such experiences, I wonder if this person is not simply unaware of the limits and weaknesses of their mind in that moment. Like someone that gets the illusion of a clear mind while high, only to realize later that all their extraordinary new understandings make no more sense, or can hardly be remembered, but somehow convince themselves that their mind was clearer than ever in that experience.
Now this is something I completely agree with, and am sure is a common -- but ignored -- issue in the art of LD'ing. Dreams are the only things in human experience whose existence relies completely on memory, so how we remember our experience is critical... unfortunately, many, many people tend to quickly form memories that conform to their desires rather than carefully and humbly reviewing their raw memories immediately upon waking, and let them form into accurate renditions of their dreaming experience, for better or worse.
One of my first lucid dreams that sparked my passion for them was simply an experience of awe and appreciation for the experience. Like feeling present and appreciative while eating a good meal. Isn't that good enough?
If that is all you seek, then certainly.
Or do I need to do a metacognitive meditation while I eat to really feel I wasn't semi-living?
No, I don't think so. You never really need to examine how you are thinking about an experience to appreciate the experience; the opposite, appreciating the experience without thinking about how you are appreciating it is in my mind a supremely better attitude. I really like the term "semi-living," BTW; I have a feeling that is the cognitive default mode for most people, and one that self-awareness (which is to me a decidedly unnatural state) easily elevates to "full-on living" -- without meditation or metacognition!
|
|
Bookmarks