I realize that this is pretty much pointless to post now, but I already had it typed up. Besides, it didn't really feel like much attention was payed before OP left, so.

Quote Originally Posted by buriedmonsters View Post
This is really very simple. If you have no soul, you were not created with purpose, and were simply born to die and rot that means you have no value.
If you "were not created with a purpose", then obviously you weren't born to die and rot. That would be a purpose.

Quote Originally Posted by buriedmonsters View Post
You are as worthwhile as the chicken I just ate for dinner.
Actually, there are many who would partially agree with that. They tend to be vegan.

Quote Originally Posted by buriedmonsters View Post
And if you are going to kill something that could possibly be a human life, you better make fucking sure you're 100% correct and be able to substantiate your claims with evidence. So far, you are not able to prove that a soul does not inhabit a fetus. Therefore, it is possible that by aborting a fetus, you may possibly be killing a soul.
So you're saying that when a body dies, the soul dies with it? What exactly is the point of this soul-thing?

Quote Originally Posted by buriedmonsters View Post
Plants don't have brains. Lets not argue about them please.
Neither does a newly conceived fetus. At that point it's literally a one-celled organism. One cell does not a brain make.

Quote Originally Posted by Pan View Post
People should really stop using the term "prove"...empirical science dictates that hypotheses can not be proven, only falsified. Your data can support your hypothesis or provide basis to reject it, but it can never prove anything. The notion that people constantly ask for proof, or to be proven right or wrong is fundamentally flawed. Unless you are using the mathematical definition or some philosophical definition of proof that I'm unfamiliar with.
I believe they mean "prove beyond a reasonable doubt". That's mostly what it means.