I used to be really into this sort of categorizing dreams (as a species we're obsessed with putting labels on things), I think it really actually doen't matter, unless you're really trying to get lucid and you keep only getting dreams about lucidity or with control but no awareness. But I think Sageous is the primary promoter of this notion of "false lucids," and I believe his definition is that the dreamer, upon *awakening*, thinks he had a lucid dream, but if you ask for the details not once was their any indication that they were aware *in the dream* that they were dreaming.
Heck, I had two semi/false lucids a few days ago, one where I was "practicing dream yoga" by simultaneously being aware of "my dream body" and keeping attention "on the dream around me" but I'm 100% sure I had no actual idea that I was dreaming -- it was like dreaming of the memory of a lucid dream, where you do and think the things you do while lucid, but missing the critical element of awareness that you're actually in a dream. Maybe that's a good definition of false lucid . Having a dream-in-dream where you're fully lucid is just a lucid dream, nothing false about it.
In another one I was telling my friends not to be afraid if the dream started collapsing around them, because "after all, I started it." Again with no actual aware recognition of the dream state.
|
|
Bookmarks