Ok first, this is very/extremely/insanely HARD TO READ. I do not know how you chose/decided to write LIKE THIS.

It's like trying to read a terms of agreement except less of a definite structure.


Now onto the actual points. You say half gravity alot, and you use it to 'prove' your theory that is also ultimate and actual (?) when you never even define what half gravity is. Most physics people hear gravity and go "oh ok, must be acceleration" but I don't believe that is what you mean by it, please explain....

You throw around alot of physics terms thinking it will help with your argument, one of the main culprits is electromagnetism. I really hope you know what electromagnetism is since the way you use it makes absolutely no sense.
Moreover, television does take the real/actual form and manifestation of ELECTROMAGNETISM. THIS CONSTITUTES PROOF THAT TV IS A VERY SERIOUS AND REAL PROBLEM.
Television USES electromagnetism to work, cause you know... it's AC, which means that it's sending out electromagnetic waves... that do stuff which has nothing to do with my well being or thought.

Also you say television is a very serious and real problem because it is 'fully similar' to thoughts except they are 'flattened'. I have no idea what you mean by flattened but television is no where near thoughts. Going into your confusing world, television takes on only 2 of the 5 senses (ESP not being considered) while the real world engages all 5 of the senses, and thoughts are not engaging any really.
Like you said thought "best describes sensory experience when space is invisible and visible in fundamental equilibrium and balance." When TV is doing ONLY visual and hearing, how can these two things be even remotely alike??


Now you really have to work on your writing, and remember THIS IS NOT A TERMS OF AGREEMENT and WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR LOOPHOLES TO GET MONEY, so this whole paragraph here.
Why do/would the modern, mainstream, academic, theoretical physicists, the academic dream theorists, the governments, and the beneficiaries, proponents, and advocates of television continue to evade and deny the facts and truths of what I have clearly and undeniably proven here? Well, who currently has, and desires to continue to have, authority here? More problems, more unnatural experience, more stupidity/ignorance, and more lies mean more money and more governmental intervention/size. The business of making money and excess profits (i.e., that of changing experience from what is natural, including power and control over experience, thoughts, and people) is apparently far more important than truth, reality, facts, great/proper/correct thinking, people, free experience, labor, our autonomy, our rights, our freedoms, our health, our growth, our privacy, independent and free thinkers, our children, the future, our self-sufficiency, and our FREE, extensive, integrated, enjoyable, desirable, sustainable, healthy, and natural experiences.
Could be turned into "Why do the modern official people continue to evade and deny the facts I have clearly proven here? Well, who currently desires to continue to have authority here? More problems and more lies mean more money. The business of making money is apparently far more important than truth."

You can see that these both will do the same job, except my version is easier on the eyes and I didn't use words that mean the same exact thing.

There is weightlessness, the space is black, and we are not touching anything. THINK ABOUT IT. It all makes sense.
Outer space precludes and destroys our being, thought, and experience. Accordingly, our ability to understanding outer space is significantly limited.
Outer space isn't actually black... it just has no matter floating around for light to bounce off of.


Dream experience fundamentally, ultimately, generally, actually, theoretically, and naturally unifies and balances gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism and physics/physical experience (including seen, felt, AND touched).
You can't say theoretically and actually to describe the same thing. It literally contradicts each other. It's like saying you believe that toast is brown and that it is also a fact that toast is brown, when it really is just that you're wearing tinted contact lenses that make you believe that. Horrible example but I really hope you get what I mean, you can't just say theoretical to sound fancy and sophisticated.