It's amazing how people in general define what's presumed to be scatterbrained and what's "rational" or collected "properly" in terms of syntax of anything in forms communication. Especially with things like double spaced essays, I always presumed that format alone was just fitted to make it easier on the eyes, but I can never understand that when a person just reads something beyond that, it's scattered brained. Whether it's a subconscious thing, or unconscious reflex, it doesn't really seem to have substantial claim that this is apparent for most people.
It seems like a major flaw in thought processing in the person attempting to receive the information, or maybe it's just me. It's probably just me, but I doubt I would be the only person in the world with a presumed mindset that spacing things out would actually make things easier on a person's eyes, but not really for their mind? I just don't understand how people can comprehend things that are cluttered and packed together without having the possibility of accidentally backtracking their eyes, which would make more of an inconvenience in terms of reading and analyzing the information shown to them.
Another thing that continues to amaze me is that with the totality of possible perceptions to view this reality, with the totality of all mindsets to view this reality, the ideologies, the convictions, the so called "delusions" that are simple labels for "I don't understand this concept as something practical for the reality I engage in, so I'll just be an asshole and say their ideas are shit." I really think it's solely for that purpose. It's clearly obvious that with the preconceptions you have that's sustained by the schemata of life that deeper levels of your mind and psyche has formatted based on your experiences with others, the environment, and more, how can a person really claim that their reality is really the only practical reality? How can a person actually become so dumbfounded in accepting this certain mechanic of a phenomena, a prime example being Lucid Dreaming, and completely disregard anything they think is "absurd"? It seems kind of ironic that with the first level of awareness of being informed of Lucid Dreaming, a person would have a misconception (in terms of just realizing for the first time there's a label for being aware of your dreams) that Lucid Dreaming itself would be insane and scary the first time.
Then when they realize it's something natural that occurs at night, they'll have their own formatting of what's practical now, but then they'll start getting ideas that might dissociate themselves from the reality they were so used to before they understood the concept of Lucid Dreaming. In fact, it amazes me how people are just willing to just stick with this conception of Lucid Dreaming being within the confines of your mind, and even with things Beyond Dreaming, they would still presume it's within the confines of your mind. Simply because they're so fascinated that their subconscious can give them a reality to near perfection or absolute perfection that makes a convincing label to them that, "Oh, my mind is so powerful, so any kind of absurd thinking like "Astral Projection," "Shared Dreaming," and anything absurd in my absurd list is just absurd." And then there's the burden of truth debate that people just love going about doing all the time. They can easily place the burden of truth on the person who would be open-minded to a certain concept, but never really acknowledge how that whatever theory they're holding on to like a fucking crack baby is simply just an educated guess sustained through practical evidence....whether it's quantitative or qualitative...they never really acknowledge it's technically just a guess. This means that it's based on what a collection of people presume to be "practical," which itself is flawed based on observation alone.
But people are willing to be so emotionally glued to that theory that they use to falsify anything that's absurd.....do they even realize that the same theory that was formulated took various people who would be considered "batshit crazy" back then? Whether it's Darwin's limited perception on how his observations in terms of natural selection was created, or even someone asking how effective a lucid dreaming technique is....do people realize that by saying certain things are absurd, and yet claim to be scientific, if a person has something they believe that the other person reject....and that same person doesn't preach something to be true, they still imply that it's being preached either way? I guess people don't really understand what's open-minded anymore. It's more of a tolerance rather than trying to be subjective, either it's fear of losing the foundations that makes them grounded in this reality, or simply not realizing that if one really wants to claim something is stupid, absurd, or that a person is just going in complete mental dissonance is just that person's way of copping out of attempting to understand why that individual would engage in exploring a certain belief that is just not sustained with "adequate evidence?" People should just completely disregard thinking they're scientific if they can't even just say, "Hey, I understand that you have your reasons for believing something I am not able to understand, and because I have a limited time in this reality to explore why you prefer or are interested in this concept, I will just have to let things be the way they are, and just explore many things, but not everything." But nope, it's just, "You're crazy, you're stupid, you're incompetent.......but I'll just disregard that by me saying that to you as an insult only makes myself just as or more delusional than you are because I'm completely blocking off that my perception of this reality isn't really that absolute, and I am not capable of having all the answers to disprove your belief.....but I'll just presume that I can do that and just make myself look like a twat face while I gather other people who agree with me and go "YEAH! I'm RIGHT, and you're NOT!" Even though I know I'm full of shit saying that to you, who cares, my arrogance in sticking with educated guesses, and your endeavor of finding more educated guesses are absurd! I mean, come on, who relies on educated guesses these days? Oh wait, that's me, but my incompetence in realizing that sustains my ignorance either way, and you're still wrong!"
Ah, amazing how we're all so full of shit, but when we do try to be open-minded, it's just impossible now with how people forget the obvious.
I guess when one thing is less crazy, the more crazy aspect has to shift somewhere else. It's just pushing the more crazy aspect and never pulling back. Oh whatever, this was a nice pre-meal before sleeping.
Good night.
Bookmarks