Quote Originally Posted by LouaiB View Post
Well, all I can do is ask one question: Are they really un-credible to the extent that we can ignore their papers? I mean, is it really that bad? Are they really unqualified at all?
This is not sarcasm BTW, I'm really serious.
The only way to know for sure would be for unbiased outsiders to scrutinize their papers carefully. There would probably be needed both people knowledgeable in statistics, and in various other areas, in order to perform an in-depth review.

This, by the way, would take both a lot of time, money, and much effort, because the "climate scientists" have been very prolific.

But at the end of the day, which ever results these unbiased outsiders arrived at, there would still be public doubt. But at least they themselves would know.