Quote Originally Posted by Alric View Post
That is pretty much your problem right there. You don't care what the data is saying. Honestly, it seems like you are just trolling and maybe if you stopped trolling, people would have a more friendly attitude towards you. I am not sure how being obnoxious and insulting people is supposed to get people to move towards your stated goal.

Would be nice if you could post like a mature human being, and stick to the data relating to the actual topic, instead of constantly going off on pointless rants.
No! take a step back and think about what's being said here. The further you try to push this argument the more you are proving his point.
I read his responses from the last two pages and he doesn't actually oppose climate change. He opposes the notion of taking a radical stance and neglecting logic in favour of fervent belief.
You are a perpetrator of this, stating that skepticism of a data is inherently bad because we are discussing climate change. It's a grey area of asserting fact vs imposing beliefs.

As backward as it might seem, there is still valuable criticism to be found in the arguments that some skeptics propose. Morally I don't agree with their lack of willingness to take action, but ultimately it is there choice whether or nor to be satisfied with the current level of confidence behind the various climate change principles.