 Originally Posted by NyxCC
Sure, while there is some statistical validity of widely published soy and cancer research, the finding in the case of Asians may not account for other factors, like drinking green tea or eating more veggies, or as you pointed genetics. I agree with you on that, it does sound a bit like a weak argument, if you phrase it the way it is in the quote. However, other studies have found a decreased occurrence of certain cancers after soy usage in both Asian and non-Asian subjects.
The problem is that there are so many differences between societies, at least thousands. To just point out that "I guess there might be some cause-effect fallacy going on" isn't enough. There are so many differences that it's next to pointless to even propose that there may be a direct cause-effect relationship between any two qualities you may observe the society to have.
Even if multiple societies who consume a lot of soy products were shown to have decreased cancer rates, it still wouldn't be enough. It's just too likely that they're coincidences or both effects of the same cause. Like of having a healthy lifestyle, which itself involves hundreds of specific health factors (green tea, going outside more, eating organic foods, decreased stress, etc.) and any one of those hundreds of things could be the cause of the lower cancer rates.
 Originally Posted by tommo
Also if anyone *cough* salty*ahem* wants to get in to a GMO debate, go dig up the GMO thread and post there. Also stop eating any food from the supermarket or any food farmers grow at all. And don't let me catch you buying seeds from the garden store either, I want you out picking wild berries.
What are you talking about?
|
|
Bookmarks